M&A Valuation Methods: How to Value Acquisition Targets
Complete guide to M&A valuation methods. Learn DCF, comparable companies, precedent transactions, and other valuation techniques for acquisitions.
Introduction: What is Fair Value?
“Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.” – Warren Buffett
In M&A, getting valuation right is crucial. Pay too much, and you destroy shareholder value. Pay too little, and you lose the deal. The challenge is that “fair value” isn’t a single number—it’s a range informed by multiple methodologies.
This guide covers the primary valuation methods used in M&A transactions.
Valuation Frameworks
The Three Primary Methods
| Method | Approach | When Most Useful |
|---|---|---|
| DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) | Intrinsic value from future cash flows | Stable, predictable businesses |
| Comparable Companies | Relative value from peer trading multiples | Public company targets with good peers |
| Precedent Transactions | Value from similar past deals | To understand market price/control premium |
Enterprise Value vs Equity Value
Enterprise Value (EV): Value of entire business (debt + equity) $$EV = Market\ Cap + Total\ Debt - Cash$$
Equity Value: Value attributable to shareholders $$Equity\ Value = EV - Debt + Cash$$
Why It Matters:
- Acquirer pays equity value to shareholders
- But assumes (or refinances) debt
- Total cost = Enterprise Value
Method 1: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
Concept
The value of a business equals the present value of all future cash flows it will generate.
$$Value = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{FCF_t}{(1+WACC)^t} + \frac{Terminal\ Value}{(1+WACC)^n}$$
Step-by-Step DCF
Step 1: Project Free Cash Flows
$$Free\ Cash\ Flow = EBIT(1-T) + Depreciation - CapEx - \Delta Working\ Capital$$
Projection Period: Typically 5-10 years
Key Assumptions:
- Revenue growth rates
- Margin trends
- Capital expenditure needs
- Working capital requirements
Step 2: Determine Discount Rate (WACC)
$$WACC = w_E \times r_E + w_D \times r_D \times (1-T)$$
For target, use:
- Target’s capital structure (or optimal)
- Target’s cost of equity (CAPM)
- Target’s cost of debt
Step 3: Calculate Terminal Value
Perpetuity Growth Method: $$TV = \frac{FCF_{n+1}}{WACC - g}$$
Exit Multiple Method: $$TV = EBITDA_n \times Exit\ Multiple$$
Step 4: Discount to Present Value
$$DCF\ Value = \sum PV(FCF) + PV(Terminal\ Value)$$
DCF Example
Target Company Projections (₹ crore):
| Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 100 | 115 | 130 | 145 | 160 |
| EBITDA | 25 | 29 | 33 | 36 | 40 |
| EBIT | 20 | 24 | 28 | 31 | 35 |
| Tax (25%) | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| NOPAT | 15 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 26 |
| D&A | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| CapEx | -8 | -9 | -10 | -10 | -10 |
| ΔWC | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 | -3 |
| FCF | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 18 |
Assumptions:
- WACC: 12%
- Terminal growth: 4%
- Terminal multiple: 8x EBITDA
Terminal Value (Perpetuity): $$TV = \frac{18 \times 1.04}{0.12 - 0.04} = \frac{18.72}{0.08} = ₹234\ crore$$
Present Value Calculation:
| Year | FCF | Discount Factor | PV |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 0.893 | 8.0 |
| 2 | 11 | 0.797 | 8.8 |
| 3 | 13 | 0.712 | 9.3 |
| 4 | 15 | 0.636 | 9.5 |
| 5 | 18 | 0.567 | 10.2 |
| TV | 234 | 0.567 | 132.7 |
| Total EV | ₹178.5 crore |
DCF Sensitivity Analysis
Terminal growth rate and WACC sensitivity:
| WACC \ g | 3% | 4% | 5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10% | 215 | 250 | 300 |
| 12% | 165 | 185 | 210 |
| 14% | 135 | 150 | 165 |
Key Insight: Small changes in assumptions create big value swings.
DCF Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Theoretically sound (intrinsic value)
- Forces rigorous analysis of business
- Less affected by market sentiment
Cons:
- Highly sensitive to assumptions
- Terminal value often dominates
- Requires detailed projections
- Subjective inputs
Method 2: Comparable Company Analysis
Concept
Value target based on how similar public companies are trading.
$$Target\ Value = Target\ Metric \times Peer\ Multiple$$
Common Multiples
1. EV/EBITDA
- Most common for M&A
- Capital structure neutral
- Ignores depreciation differences
2. EV/Revenue
- For loss-making or high-growth companies
- Tech/SaaS companies
3. P/E (Price/Earnings)
- Simple, intuitive
- Affected by capital structure
4. P/B (Price/Book)
- For asset-heavy industries
- Banks, real estate
Step-by-Step Comparable Analysis
Step 1: Select Comparable Companies
Criteria:
- Same industry
- Similar business model
- Similar size
- Similar growth profile
- Similar geography
Step 2: Calculate Trading Multiples
For each comparable:
- Current market cap
- Net debt
- Enterprise value
- EBITDA, Revenue, Earnings
- Calculate multiples
Step 3: Analyze and Select Multiple
| Company | EV/EBITDA | EV/Revenue | P/E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer A | 12.0x | 3.5x | 22x |
| Peer B | 10.5x | 2.8x | 18x |
| Peer C | 14.0x | 4.2x | 25x |
| Peer D | 11.0x | 3.0x | 20x |
| Median | 11.25x | 3.25x | 21x |
| Mean | 11.9x | 3.4x | 21.3x |
Step 4: Apply to Target
Target EBITDA: ₹40 crore Applied Multiple: 11.25x (median) Implied EV: ₹450 crore
Premium/Discount Adjustments
Premium for:
- Higher growth
- Better margins
- Stronger market position
- Better management
Discount for:
- Lower growth
- Weaker margins
- Smaller size
- Illiquidity (private company)
Typical Private Company Discount: 15-30%
Comparable Analysis Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Market-based (what investors actually pay)
- Simple, intuitive
- Less subjective than DCF
Cons:
- Requires truly comparable companies
- Market may be over/undervalued
- Doesn’t capture unique characteristics
- No control premium
Method 3: Precedent Transactions
Concept
Value target based on multiples paid in similar past M&A deals.
$$Target\ Value = Target\ Metric \times Precedent\ Deal\ Multiple$$
Why Different from Comps?
Precedent transactions include:
- Control premium: Premium paid for controlling stake
- Synergy value: Value of expected synergies
- Deal dynamics: Competitive bidding, strategic urgency
Step-by-Step Precedent Analysis
Step 1: Identify Relevant Transactions
Criteria:
- Same or related industry
- Similar target size
- Recent (typically last 3-5 years)
- Similar deal context
Step 2: Gather Transaction Data
| Transaction | Date | EV (₹ Cr) | EBITDA | EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deal A | 2023 | 500 | 40 | 12.5x |
| Deal B | 2022 | 800 | 60 | 13.3x |
| Deal C | 2022 | 350 | 30 | 11.7x |
| Deal D | 2021 | 600 | 45 | 13.3x |
| Median | 12.9x |
Step 3: Analyze Transaction Context
- Was it competitive auction?
- Strategic or financial buyer?
- Market conditions at time
- Synergies expected
Step 4: Apply to Target
Target EBITDA: ₹40 crore Applied Multiple: 12.9x Implied EV: ₹516 crore
Control Premium Analysis
Control Premium = (Acquisition Price - Pre-Deal Price) / Pre-Deal Price
Typical Range: 20-40%
Example:
- Target trading at ₹100/share
- Acquisition price: ₹130/share
- Control premium: 30%
Precedent Analysis Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Reflects actual prices paid
- Includes control premium
- Market test of value
Cons:
- Deal circumstances vary
- Limited comparable transactions
- Market conditions change
- Synergy assumptions unclear
Method 4: Asset-Based Valuation
When to Use
- Liquidation scenarios
- Asset-heavy businesses
- Holding companies
- Real estate companies
Approaches
1. Book Value $$Value = Total\ Assets - Total\ Liabilities$$
2. Adjusted Book Value Revalue assets to market value:
- Real estate at current values
- Investments at market price
- Intangibles assessed
3. Liquidation Value What assets would fetch if sold:
- Forced sale discount
- Transaction costs
- Wind-down costs
Example
| Asset | Book Value | Market Value |
|---|---|---|
| Land | 10 | 50 |
| Building | 20 | 30 |
| Equipment | 15 | 10 |
| Inventory | 25 | 20 |
| Receivables | 30 | 28 |
| Total Assets | 100 | 138 |
| Liabilities | 40 | 40 |
| Net Asset Value | 60 | 98 |
Synergy Valuation
Types of Synergies
Cost Synergies (More Reliable):
- Headcount reduction
- Facility consolidation
- Procurement savings
- Overhead elimination
Revenue Synergies (Less Reliable):
- Cross-selling
- Geographic expansion
- New customer access
- Product bundling
Valuing Synergies
$$Synergy\ Value = \frac{Annual\ Synergies \times (1-T)}{WACC - g}$$
Example:
- Annual cost synergies: ₹20 crore
- Tax rate: 25%
- WACC: 12%
- Growth: 2%
$$Synergy\ Value = \frac{20 \times 0.75}{0.12 - 0.02} = \frac{15}{0.10} = ₹150\ crore$$
Synergy Split
Who captures the synergy value?
- Target shareholders want premium for synergies
- Acquirer wants to keep synergy value
- Competitive process often transfers value to target
Typical: Target captures 30-50% of expected synergies
Putting It All Together: Valuation Football Field
Creating a Valuation Range
| Method | Low | Mid | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | 160 | 180 | 210 |
| Comparable Cos | 140 | 170 | 200 |
| Precedent Txns | 180 | 200 | 230 |
| Asset Value | 95 | 98 | 100 |
Valuation Range: ₹160-210 crore Negotiation Target: ₹175-190 crore
Football Field Chart
Asset Value |===|
Comp Companies |=======|
DCF |========|
Precedents |==========|
$140 $160 $180 $200 $220
Triangulation
No single method is “correct.” Use multiple methods and:
- Understand why values differ
- Weight methods appropriately
- Consider deal context
- Stress-test assumptions
Indian M&A Valuation Considerations
Challenges
1. Limited Comparables
- Fewer listed companies in some sectors
- Less deal activity for precedents
2. Promoter Premium
- Family businesses command control premium
- Succession considerations
3. Related Party Complexity
- Inter-company transactions
- Adjustments needed
4. Illiquidity Discount
- Private companies less liquid
- Typical discount: 20-30%
Regulatory Valuation
SEBI Takeover Code: Minimum price based on:
- Highest price paid by acquirer in 52 weeks
- Volume-weighted average price (60 trading days, 26 weeks)
- Price per share calculation formula
Key Takeaways
- Use multiple methods – No single method is definitive
- DCF for intrinsic value – But highly sensitive to assumptions
- Comps for market reference – But must be truly comparable
- Precedents include premium – Reflect actual deal prices
- Synergies drive premium – But often overestimated
- Create valuation range – Not a single point estimate
- Context matters – Competitive dynamics, strategic fit influence price
Disclaimer
This article is for educational purposes only. Actual M&A valuation requires professional expertise. Consult qualified advisors for specific transactions. This is not investment advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which valuation method is best? A: Depends on the situation. DCF for stable businesses with predictable cash flows, comps when good peers exist, precedents to understand market pricing. Use multiple methods.
Q: Why do DCF values vary so much? A: Terminal value often comprises 50-80% of DCF value. Small changes in growth rate or discount rate create large value swings. Always do sensitivity analysis.
Q: How much premium is typical in M&A? A: Control premiums typically range 20-40% over pre-deal trading price. Competitive auctions or strategic buyers may pay more.
Q: Should I use EBITDA or revenue multiples? A: EBITDA for profitable companies (more common). Revenue for growth companies, tech/SaaS, or loss-makers where EBITDA isn’t meaningful.
Q: How do you value a loss-making company? A: Use revenue multiples, DCF with path to profitability, comparable transactions, or strategic value (technology, customer base, market position).
Valuation in M&A is as much art as science. Numbers provide structure, but judgment interprets them. The best dealmakers combine rigorous analysis with commercial insight—knowing not just what a business is worth, but what it’s worth to a particular buyer in a specific context.