Inventory Valuation Methods: FIFO, Weighted Average, and Specific Identification
Complete guide to inventory valuation methods in India. Learn FIFO, Weighted Average, and Specific Identification with practical examples and their impact on financial statements.
Ramesh’s Inventory Puzzle
Ramesh runs an electronics store. In March, he bought:
- 100 phones @ ₹10,000 each on March 5
- 100 phones @ ₹12,000 each on March 20
By March 31, he sold 120 phones at ₹15,000 each.
His accountant asked: “Which phones did you sell—the ₹10,000 ones or the ₹12,000 ones?”
Ramesh was puzzled. “They’re all the same model. Does it matter?”
It matters a lot.
If he sold the ₹10,000 phones: Cost = ₹12 lakh, Profit = ₹6 lakh If he sold the ₹12,000 phones: Cost = ₹14.4 lakh, Profit = ₹3.6 lakh
Same sales, different profits. That’s the power of inventory valuation.
Why Inventory Valuation Matters
Impact on Financial Statements
| Higher Inventory Value | Lower Inventory Value |
|---|---|
| Lower COGS | Higher COGS |
| Higher Gross Profit | Lower Gross Profit |
| Higher Net Profit | Lower Net Profit |
| Higher Tax | Lower Tax |
| Higher Assets | Lower Assets |
The Basic Formula
Opening Inventory + Purchases - Closing Inventory = Cost of Goods Sold
Therefore:
Higher Closing Inventory = Lower COGS = Higher Profit
Lower Closing Inventory = Higher COGS = Lower Profit
Inventory Valuation Principle
Lower of Cost or Net Realizable Value (NRV)
As per Ind AS 2 / AS 2:
Inventory Value = Lower of (Cost, NRV)
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Cost | Purchase price + Conversion costs + Other costs to bring to current location |
| NRV | Estimated selling price - Estimated costs to complete - Estimated selling costs |
Example: NRV Application
| Item | Cost | Selling Price | Selling Costs | NRV | Inventory Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product A | ₹100 | ₹150 | ₹10 | ₹140 | ₹100 (Cost) |
| Product B | ₹100 | ₹90 | ₹10 | ₹80 | ₹80 (NRV) |
Product B must be written down to ₹80.
Cost Flow Assumptions
When identical items are purchased at different prices, we need a method to determine which cost flows to COGS and which remains in inventory.
Methods Allowed (Ind AS 2 / AS 2)
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
| FIFO | First In, First Out |
| Weighted Average | Average of all purchases |
| Specific Identification | Actual cost of specific items |
LIFO Not Allowed
LIFO (Last In, First Out) is explicitly prohibited under:
- Ind AS 2
- AS 2
- IFRS
FIFO (First In, First Out)
Concept
Items purchased first are assumed to be sold first. Closing inventory consists of most recent purchases.
Characteristics
| Aspect | FIFO |
|---|---|
| COGS | Based on oldest costs |
| Closing inventory | Based on newest costs |
| In rising prices | Lower COGS, higher profit |
| In falling prices | Higher COGS, lower profit |
Example: FIFO Method
Transactions:
| Date | Particulars | Quantity | Rate | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1 | Opening Stock | 100 | ₹10 | ₹1,000 |
| Mar 10 | Purchase | 200 | ₹12 | ₹2,400 |
| Mar 15 | Sale | (150) | ||
| Mar 20 | Purchase | 150 | ₹14 | ₹2,100 |
| Mar 25 | Sale | (200) |
FIFO Calculation:
Sale on March 15 (150 units):
- 100 units @ ₹10 = ₹1,000 (from opening)
- 50 units @ ₹12 = ₹600 (from Mar 10 purchase)
- Total COGS = ₹1,600
Stock after March 15: 150 units @ ₹12 = ₹1,800
Sale on March 25 (200 units):
- 150 units @ ₹12 = ₹1,800 (remaining from Mar 10)
- 50 units @ ₹14 = ₹700 (from Mar 20 purchase)
- Total COGS = ₹2,500
Closing Stock: 100 units @ ₹14 = ₹1,400
Summary:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Opening Stock | ₹1,000 |
| Purchases | ₹4,500 |
| Goods Available | ₹5,500 |
| Less: Closing Stock | ₹1,400 |
| Cost of Goods Sold | ₹4,100 |
Weighted Average Method
Concept
Calculate average cost of all units available for sale. Use this average for both COGS and closing inventory.
Types
| Type | When Average Calculated |
|---|---|
| Periodic Weighted Average | At end of period |
| Moving Weighted Average | After each purchase |
Periodic Weighted Average Example
Same transactions as FIFO example:
| Date | Particulars | Quantity | Rate | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1 | Opening Stock | 100 | ₹10 | ₹1,000 |
| Mar 10 | Purchase | 200 | ₹12 | ₹2,400 |
| Mar 20 | Purchase | 150 | ₹14 | ₹2,100 |
| Total | 450 | ₹5,500 |
Weighted Average Cost:
₹5,500 / 450 units = ₹12.22 per unit
Calculation:
| Item | Units | Rate | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Available | 450 | ₹12.22 | ₹5,500 |
| Less: Sales | 350 | ₹12.22 | ₹4,277 |
| Closing Stock | 100 | ₹12.22 | ₹1,222 |
Moving Weighted Average Example
Stock Ledger with Moving Average:
| Date | In | Out | Balance | Average Cost | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1 | 100 @ ₹10 | 100 | ₹10.00 | ₹1,000 | |
| Mar 10 | 200 @ ₹12 | 300 | ₹11.33* | ₹3,400 | |
| Mar 15 | 150 | 150 | ₹11.33 | ₹1,700 | |
| Mar 20 | 150 @ ₹14 | 300 | ₹12.67** | ₹3,800 | |
| Mar 25 | 200 | 100 | ₹12.67 | ₹1,267 |
*Average after Mar 10: (1,000 + 2,400) / 300 = ₹11.33 **Average after Mar 20: (1,700 + 2,100) / 300 = ₹12.67
Closing Stock: 100 units @ ₹12.67 = ₹1,267 COGS: ₹5,500 - ₹1,267 = ₹4,233
Specific Identification Method
Concept
Track actual cost of each specific item. Used for unique, high-value items.
When to Use
| Suitable For | Not Suitable For |
|---|---|
| Automobiles | Rice, wheat |
| Real estate | Electronics |
| Jewelry | Clothing |
| Art pieces | FMCG products |
| Custom machinery | Standard parts |
Example
Car Dealer:
| Vehicle | Purchase Cost | Sold? | COGS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda City - MH01AB1234 | ₹12,00,000 | Yes | ₹12,00,000 |
| Maruti Swift - MH01AB1235 | ₹8,00,000 | No | - |
| Hyundai Creta - MH01AB1236 | ₹15,00,000 | Yes | ₹15,00,000 |
| Total COGS | ₹27,00,000 | ||
| Closing Stock | ₹8,00,000 |
Comparison of Methods
Same Data, Different Results
Using our example (450 units purchased, 350 sold):
| Method | Closing Stock | COGS |
|---|---|---|
| FIFO | ₹1,400 | ₹4,100 |
| Weighted Average (Periodic) | ₹1,222 | ₹4,278 |
| Weighted Average (Moving) | ₹1,267 | ₹4,233 |
Impact in Rising Prices
| Method | COGS | Gross Profit | Tax | Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIFO | Lower | Higher | Higher | Lower |
| Weighted Average | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Impact in Falling Prices
| Method | COGS | Gross Profit | Tax | Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIFO | Higher | Lower | Lower | Higher |
| Weighted Average | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Which Method to Choose?
Factors to Consider
| Factor | FIFO Better | Weighted Average Better |
|---|---|---|
| Price trend | Falling prices | Rising prices (lower tax) |
| Physical flow | Actual FIFO flow | Random/mixed flow |
| Complexity | Lower volume | High volume, many transactions |
| Industry practice | Perishables | Manufacturing |
| Balance sheet | More current values | Smoothed values |
Industry Practices
| Industry | Common Method | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Retail | FIFO | Physical flow matches |
| Manufacturing | Weighted Average | Many components |
| Pharmaceuticals | FIFO | Expiry dates |
| Automobiles | Specific Identification | Unique items |
| Trading | FIFO or Weighted Average | Depends on goods |
Accounting Entries
Purchase Entry
Purchases A/c (or Inventory A/c) Dr. 50,000
Input GST A/c Dr. 9,000
To Supplier A/c 59,000
(Being goods purchased)
Sale Entry
Customer A/c Dr. 70,800
To Sales A/c 60,000
To Output GST A/c 10,800
(Being goods sold)
Cost of Goods Sold Entry (Perpetual System)
Cost of Goods Sold A/c Dr. 40,000
To Inventory A/c 40,000
(Being COGS recorded)
Closing Stock Entry (Periodic System)
Closing Stock A/c Dr. 15,000
To Trading A/c 15,000
(Being closing stock transferred)
Write-down Entry
Loss on Inventory Write-down A/c Dr. 5,000
To Inventory A/c 5,000
(Being inventory written down to NRV)
Perpetual vs Periodic Inventory System
Comparison
| Aspect | Perpetual System | Periodic System |
|---|---|---|
| Stock record | Continuous updates | End of period count |
| COGS | Known immediately | Calculated at period end |
| Physical count | Verification purpose | Determines inventory |
| Technology | Requires software | Manual possible |
| Cost | Higher setup cost | Lower setup cost |
| Accuracy | Higher | Lower (no continuous tracking) |
Perpetual System Example
Stock Ledger Card:
| Date | Description | In | Out | Balance | Rate | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1 | Opening | 100 | ₹10 | ₹1,000 | ||
| Apr 5 | Purchase | 50 | 150 | ₹12* | ₹1,600 | |
| Apr 10 | Sale | 80 | 70 | ₹10.67 | ₹747 | |
| Apr 15 | Purchase | 100 | 170 | ₹11.16** | ₹1,897 | |
| Apr 25 | Sale | 120 | 50 | ₹11.16 | ₹558 |
*New average: (1,000 + 600) / 150 = ₹10.67 **New average: (747 + 1,150) / 170 = ₹11.16
Special Inventory Situations
Joint Products
Products from same process with significant value.
Example: Crude oil → Petrol, Diesel, LPG
Cost Allocation Methods:
- Physical quantity method
- Sales value method
- Net realizable value method
By-Products
Products from same process with minor value.
Treatment: Credit by-product NRV to main product cost.
Scrap
Material with minimal value.
Treatment: Credit scrap value when sold.
Work-in-Progress (WIP)
Partially completed goods.
Valuation: Include proportionate conversion costs.
Inventory Disclosures
Required Disclosures (Ind AS 2)
| Disclosure | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Accounting policies | Cost formula used |
| Carrying amount | Total and by category |
| COGS | Amount recognized as expense |
| Write-downs | Amount recognized in period |
| Reversals | Write-down reversals |
| Pledged inventory | Inventory as security |
Example Disclosure
Note X: Inventories
| Particulars | 31 March 2024 | 31 March 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | ₹50 lakhs | ₹45 lakhs |
| Work-in-Progress | ₹20 lakhs | ₹18 lakhs |
| Finished Goods | ₹80 lakhs | ₹75 lakhs |
| Stores and Spares | ₹10 lakhs | ₹12 lakhs |
| Total | ₹160 lakhs | ₹150 lakhs |
Inventories are valued at lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using weighted average method.
Common Mistakes in Inventory Valuation
Mistake 1: Inconsistent Method
Error: Switching between FIFO and Weighted Average Impact: Non-comparable financials Solution: Use consistent method; disclose changes
Mistake 2: Ignoring NRV
Error: Not writing down slow-moving inventory Impact: Overstated inventory and profit Solution: Regular NRV assessment
Mistake 3: Excluding Costs
Error: Not including freight, duties in cost Impact: Understated inventory Solution: Include all costs to bring inventory to present location
Mistake 4: Including Non-Inventoriable Costs
Error: Including abnormal waste, storage costs Impact: Overstated inventory Solution: Expense such costs immediately
Mistake 5: Poor Cut-off
Error: Including goods in transit not owned Impact: Misstated inventory Solution: Verify ownership at cut-off date
Inventory Management Ratios
Key Ratios
| Ratio | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Inventory Turnover | COGS / Average Inventory | Times inventory sold |
| Days Inventory Outstanding | 365 / Inventory Turnover | Days to sell inventory |
| Gross Margin | (Sales - COGS) / Sales | Markup percentage |
| Inventory to Sales | Inventory / Annual Sales | Stock as % of sales |
Example Analysis
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 2 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inventory Turnover | 6x | 5x | Worsening |
| DIO | 61 days | 73 days | Worsening |
| Gross Margin | 25% | 23% | Worsening |
Interpretation: Inventory is moving slower; possible obsolescence risk.
Practical Tips
For Traders
- Use FIFO for perishables
- Conduct quarterly NRV reviews
- Track slow-moving items separately
- Implement proper cut-off procedures
For Manufacturers
- Segregate raw materials, WIP, finished goods
- Apply consistent overhead allocation
- Review WIP valuation quarterly
- Document cost allocation basis
For Auditors
- Test physical count accuracy
- Verify NRV calculations
- Check cut-off procedures
- Review cost build-up
- Confirm pledged inventory
Disclaimer
This guide is for educational purposes. Inventory valuation depends on specific business circumstances and applicable accounting standards (Ind AS / IGAAP). Consult a qualified Chartered Accountant for compliance matters.
Summary
Key inventory valuation principles:
- Valuation Rule: Lower of Cost or NRV
- FIFO: First items purchased are first sold
- Weighted Average: Average cost of all units
- Specific Identification: Actual cost of specific items
- LIFO: Not allowed in India
- Consistency: Use same method consistently
- Disclosure: Transparent reporting of policies
Remember: The method chosen impacts profit, tax, and balance sheet values. Choose wisely and apply consistently.
Social Media Posts
LinkedIn: “Same inventory. Same sales. Different profits.
Ramesh sold 120 phones for ₹18 lakhs. His profit? • FIFO method: ₹6 lakhs • Weighted Average: ₹5.5 lakhs
Nothing changed in the business. Only the accounting assumption.
Key points: • FIFO: Older costs flow to COGS first • Weighted Average: Smoothed cost • LIFO: Not allowed in India
In rising prices, FIFO shows higher profit (and higher tax).
Choose your inventory method wisely. #InventoryAccounting #Finance”
Twitter/X: “Inventory Valuation 101:
FIFO: First bought = First sold Weighted Avg: Average of all purchases Specific ID: Actual cost per item
LIFO: ❌ Not allowed in India
Rising prices: FIFO → Lower COGS → Higher profit → Higher tax
Always value at: Lower of Cost or NRV
#AccountingBasics”
Instagram: “Why do accountants argue about inventory? 🤔
THE PUZZLE: Bought phones at ₹10K and ₹12K Sold some phones Which ones did we sell?
METHOD 1 - FIFO: Old ones first → Lower COGS → Higher profit
METHOD 2 - Weighted Average: Average cost → Medium profit
SAME GOODS. DIFFERENT PROFIT. 📊
Why it matters: • Higher profit = Higher tax 💸 • Lower inventory = Lower assets 📉
Pro tip: Be consistent. Don’t switch methods!
#InventoryValuation #AccountingTips”