Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS): Complete Guide for Businesses
Comprehensive guide to Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS). Learn about key standards, applicability, differences from IGAAP, and practical implementation for Indian businesses.
The Big Shift
When Reliance Industries released its first Ind AS financial statements, the numbers looked completely different from the previous year.
Net worth changed by thousands of crores. Profit figures shifted. New line items appeared.
Nothing had actually changed in the business. Only the accounting rules changed.
This is what happens when a company moves from IGAAP (Indian GAAP) to Ind AS (Indian Accounting Standards). Same business, different numbers, different story.
Understanding Ind AS is now essential for every finance professional, investor, and business owner in India.
What are Indian Accounting Standards?
Definition
Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) are a set of accounting standards converged with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and mandatory for specified companies in India.
The Journey
| Year | Milestone |
|---|---|
| 2007 | Government announces IFRS convergence |
| 2011 | Ind AS notified (implementation deferred) |
| 2015 | Ind AS roadmap announced |
| 2016 | Phase I implementation begins |
| 2017-18 | Extended to more companies |
| Ongoing | Continuous updates and amendments |
Regulatory Framework
| Authority | Role |
|---|---|
| MCA | Notification of standards |
| NACAS | Recommends standards to MCA |
| ICAI | Implementation guidance |
| SEBI | Listed company compliance |
Ind AS Applicability
Who Must Follow Ind AS?
Phase I (From 1st April 2016):
- Listed companies with net worth ≥ ₹500 crore
- Unlisted companies with net worth ≥ ₹500 crore
- Their holding, subsidiary, JV, and associate companies
Phase II (From 1st April 2017):
- Listed companies with net worth < ₹500 crore
- Unlisted companies with net worth ≥ ₹250 crore
- Their holding, subsidiary, JV, and associate companies
Voluntary Adoption:
- Any company can voluntarily adopt Ind AS
- Once adopted, cannot revert to IGAAP
Who is Exempt?
| Category | Applicable Standard |
|---|---|
| Companies not meeting threshold | IGAAP (old AS) |
| Banking companies | Separate RBI guidelines |
| Insurance companies | IRDA regulations |
| NBFCs | RBI guidelines (Ind AS from FY 2019) |
| Small companies | IGAAP |
Key Ind AS Standards
Overview of Important Standards
| Ind AS | Topic | Old AS Equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| Ind AS 1 | Presentation of Financial Statements | AS 1 |
| Ind AS 2 | Inventories | AS 2 |
| Ind AS 7 | Statement of Cash Flows | AS 3 |
| Ind AS 10 | Events After Reporting Period | AS 4 |
| Ind AS 12 | Income Taxes | AS 22 |
| Ind AS 16 | Property, Plant and Equipment | AS 10 |
| Ind AS 19 | Employee Benefits | AS 15 |
| Ind AS 21 | Foreign Currency | AS 11 |
| Ind AS 36 | Impairment of Assets | AS 28 |
| Ind AS 38 | Intangible Assets | AS 26 |
| Ind AS 109 | Financial Instruments | AS 13, AS 31 |
| Ind AS 115 | Revenue from Contracts | AS 9 |
| Ind AS 116 | Leases | AS 19 |
Major Ind AS Standards Explained
Ind AS 1: Presentation of Financial Statements
Key Requirements:
| Component | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Balance Sheet | Statement of Financial Position |
| P&L | Statement of Profit and Loss |
| Cash Flow | Statement of Cash Flows |
| Equity Changes | Statement of Changes in Equity |
| Notes | Significant accounting policies |
| Comparatives | Prior year comparison mandatory |
New Concept: OCI (Other Comprehensive Income)
Items that bypass P&L but affect equity:
- Revaluation gains on property
- Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit plans
- Foreign currency translation differences
- Fair value changes on certain investments
P&L Format:
Revenue
(-) Cost of materials
(-) Employee benefits
(-) Depreciation
(-) Other expenses
= Profit before tax
(-) Tax expense
= Profit for the year
Other Comprehensive Income:
Items that may be reclassified to P&L
Items that will not be reclassified
= Total Comprehensive Income
Ind AS 2: Inventories
Measurement:
Inventory Value = Lower of (Cost, Net Realizable Value)
Cost Methods Allowed:
- FIFO (First In, First Out)
- Weighted Average
Not Allowed:
- LIFO (Last In, First Out) - explicitly prohibited
Example:
| Item | Cost | NRV | Inventory Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product A | ₹100 | ₹120 | ₹100 (cost) |
| Product B | ₹100 | ₹80 | ₹80 (NRV) |
Ind AS 16: Property, Plant and Equipment
Key Changes from Old AS 10:
| Aspect | Old AS 10 | Ind AS 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Revaluation | Optional | Component-wise required if chosen |
| Depreciation | Based on cost | Based on cost or revalued amount |
| Residual value | Often ignored | Must be realistic |
| Component accounting | Limited | Mandatory for significant parts |
Component Accounting Example:
Aircraft (₹500 Cr):
| Component | Cost | Useful Life | Annual Depreciation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airframe | ₹300 Cr | 25 years | ₹12 Cr |
| Engines | ₹150 Cr | 15 years | ₹10 Cr |
| Interior | ₹50 Cr | 8 years | ₹6.25 Cr |
| Total | ₹500 Cr | ₹28.25 Cr |
Without Component: ₹500 Cr / 25 years = ₹20 Cr (understated depreciation)
Ind AS 109: Financial Instruments
Most Complex Standard - Key Concepts:
Classification of Financial Assets:
| Category | Measurement | When Used |
|---|---|---|
| Amortised Cost | Effective interest rate | Hold to collect cash flows |
| FVOCI | Fair value, changes in OCI | Hold to collect and sell |
| FVTPL | Fair value, changes in P&L | Trading, others |
Expected Credit Loss (ECL):
Old approach: Recognize loss when incurred New approach: Recognize expected loss upfront
| Stage | Scenario | ECL Recognition |
|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Performing | 12-month ECL |
| Stage 2 | Significant credit deterioration | Lifetime ECL |
| Stage 3 | Credit impaired | Lifetime ECL |
Example: Trade Receivables
| Age Bucket | Amount | Expected Loss Rate | ECL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30 days | ₹100 Cr | 1% | ₹1 Cr |
| 31-60 days | ₹50 Cr | 3% | ₹1.5 Cr |
| 61-90 days | ₹20 Cr | 10% | ₹2 Cr |
| > 90 days | ₹10 Cr | 30% | ₹3 Cr |
| Total ECL | ₹7.5 Cr |
Ind AS 115: Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Five-Step Model:
| Step | Action | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identify contract | Written agreement with customer |
| 2 | Identify performance obligations | Product + Installation + Maintenance |
| 3 | Determine transaction price | ₹10 lakhs (including variable) |
| 4 | Allocate to obligations | Product: ₹7L, Install: ₹1L, Maint: ₹2L |
| 5 | Recognize when satisfied | Product: delivery, Install: completion, Maint: over time |
Key Changes:
| Aspect | Old AS 9 | Ind AS 115 |
|---|---|---|
| Bundled contracts | Often single revenue | Separate performance obligations |
| Variable consideration | When certain | Estimated upfront |
| Time value of money | Often ignored | Significant financing component |
| Contract costs | Expensed | May be capitalized |
Ind AS 116: Leases
Biggest Change: Operating leases now on balance sheet.
Old Treatment (Operating Lease):
- Asset: Not on balance sheet
- Liability: Not on balance sheet
- P&L: Rent expense
Ind AS 116 Treatment:
- Asset: Right-of-Use Asset (on balance sheet)
- Liability: Lease Liability (on balance sheet)
- P&L: Depreciation + Interest (front-loaded)
Example: 5-year lease, ₹1L monthly rent
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Present Value of Lease Payments (@ 10%) | ₹46.95 lakhs |
| Right-of-Use Asset | ₹46.95 lakhs |
| Lease Liability | ₹46.95 lakhs |
Year 1 Impact:
Old: Rent expense = ₹12 lakhs
Ind AS 116:
Depreciation (₹46.95L / 5) = ₹9.39 lakhs
Interest (10% on liability) = ₹4.70 lakhs
Total expense = ₹14.09 lakhs (higher in early years!)
Impact on Financial Statements:
- Balance sheet: Assets and Liabilities increase
- D/E ratio: Worsens
- EBITDA: Improves (no rent, only depreciation)
- Net profit: Lower initially, higher later
Ind AS vs IGAAP: Key Differences
Summary of Major Differences
| Area | IGAAP | Ind AS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Risks and rewards | Performance obligation |
| Leases | Operating off-balance sheet | All leases on balance sheet |
| Financial instruments | Cost/fair value | ECL, FVOCI, FVTPL |
| Business combinations | Pooling allowed | Only acquisition method |
| Employee benefits | Corridor approach | No corridor, actuarial to OCI |
| Borrowing costs | Capitalize or expense | Must capitalize (qualifying assets) |
| Fair value | Limited use | Extensively used |
| Consolidation | Voting rights focus | Control focus |
First-Time Adoption (Ind AS 101)
Key Exemptions Available:
| Exemption | Effect |
|---|---|
| Fair value as deemed cost for PPE | Avoid full retrospective restatement |
| Business combinations before transition | Not restated |
| Employee benefits actuarial gains/losses | Reset to zero |
| Cumulative translation differences | Reset to zero |
Transition Process:
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Prepare opening balance sheet at transition date |
| 2 | Apply Ind AS retrospectively (with exemptions) |
| 3 | Disclose reconciliations (IGAAP to Ind AS) |
| 4 | Present comparatives under Ind AS |
Practical Impact Analysis
Impact on Key Metrics
| Metric | Typical Impact | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Net Worth | Can increase or decrease significantly | Fair value of assets, actuarial adjustments |
| Debt | Usually increases | Operating leases on balance sheet |
| D/E Ratio | Usually worsens | Higher debt |
| EBITDA | Usually improves | Rent replaced by depreciation |
| Net Profit | Variable | Multiple adjustments |
| EPS | Variable | Depends on profit impact |
Real-World Example
Hypothetical Company Transition:
| Item | IGAAP | Ind AS | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | ₹500 Cr | ₹580 Cr | +₹80 Cr (lease assets) |
| Total Debt | ₹150 Cr | ₹230 Cr | +₹80 Cr (lease liability) |
| Net Worth | ₹200 Cr | ₹195 Cr | -₹5 Cr (adjustments) |
| D/E Ratio | 0.75 | 1.18 | Worsened |
| EBITDA | ₹80 Cr | ₹92 Cr | +₹12 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹35 Cr | ₹32 Cr | -₹3 Cr |
Industry-Specific Impacts
Real Estate
| Ind AS | Impact |
|---|---|
| Ind AS 115 | Revenue recognition timing changes |
| Ind AS 109 | Financial guarantee treatment |
| Ind AS 116 | Land lease accounting |
Telecom
| Ind AS | Impact |
|---|---|
| Ind AS 115 | Bundled offers (handset + airtime) unbundled |
| Ind AS 116 | Tower leases on balance sheet |
| Ind AS 109 | Spectrum payment deferral |
Banks and NBFCs
| Ind AS | Impact |
|---|---|
| Ind AS 109 | ECL model (higher provisions) |
| Ind AS 32 | Compound financial instruments |
| Ind AS 107 | Extensive disclosures |
Manufacturing
| Ind AS | Impact |
|---|---|
| Ind AS 16 | Component depreciation |
| Ind AS 116 | Equipment leases |
| Ind AS 2 | Inventory measurement |
Ind AS Compliance Checklist
For CFOs and Finance Teams
Annual Compliance:
- Update accounting policies for amendments
- Review new contracts for revenue impact
- Assess financial instruments classification
- Calculate Expected Credit Loss
- Review lease arrangements
- Ensure proper disclosures
- Get auditor sign-off
Quarterly Review:
- Interim financial statements per Ind AS 34
- ECL provision adequacy
- Fair value updates
- Related party disclosures
Documentation Required
| Document | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Accounting Policy Manual | Ind AS-compliant policies |
| Transition Workpapers | Reconciliations |
| Fair Value Reports | Support for valuations |
| ECL Model | Credit loss calculations |
| Lease Schedules | ROU assets and liabilities |
| Judgment Documentation | Key estimates and assumptions |
Common Mistakes in Ind AS Implementation
Mistake 1: Ignoring Component Accounting
Error: Depreciating entire building as one asset Impact: Understated depreciation Solution: Identify significant components with different lives
Mistake 2: ECL Calculation Errors
Error: Using only historical data for ECL Impact: Understated provisions Solution: Include forward-looking information
Mistake 3: Lease Classification Errors
Error: Treating short-term leases without proper assessment Impact: Misstated balance sheet Solution: Evaluate each lease arrangement
Mistake 4: Revenue Recognition Timing
Error: Recognizing revenue before performance obligation satisfied Impact: Overstated revenue Solution: Apply five-step model strictly
Mistake 5: Inadequate Disclosures
Error: Not providing all required disclosures Impact: Audit qualifications Solution: Use disclosure checklists
Resources for Ind AS
Official Sources
| Source | Content |
|---|---|
| MCA website | Official notifications |
| ICAI website | Implementation guides |
| SEBI circulars | Listed company requirements |
| NACAS | Standard recommendations |
Learning Resources
| Resource | Best For |
|---|---|
| ICAI Study Material | Detailed technical understanding |
| BDO Ind AS Made Easy | Practical summaries |
| Deloitte Ind AS Guide | Industry-specific application |
| EY Ind AS Updates | Amendment tracking |
Disclaimer
This guide is for educational purposes. Ind AS requirements are complex and subject to frequent updates. Actual accounting treatment depends on specific facts and circumstances. Consult a qualified Chartered Accountant for compliance matters.
Summary
Key takeaways about Ind AS:
- Mandatory: For companies with net worth ≥ ₹250 crore
- Converged with IFRS: Global comparability
- Major changes: Revenue, leases, financial instruments
- Fair value focus: More estimates and judgments
- Enhanced disclosures: Greater transparency
- Continuous updates: Stay current with amendments
Ind AS is not just an accounting change—it’s a fundamental shift in how financial performance is measured and reported.
Social Media Posts
LinkedIn: “When Reliance first reported under Ind AS, net worth changed by thousands of crores. Profit figures shifted. New line items appeared.
Same business. Different numbers. Different story.
Major Ind AS impacts: • Leases: Now on balance sheet (D/E worsens) • Revenue: Performance obligation model • ECL: Provision losses upfront • Fair value: Extensively used
If you’re investing in Indian stocks, understanding Ind AS is essential. The numbers you see are shaped by these standards.
#IndAS #AccountingStandards #FinancialReporting”
Twitter/X: “Ind AS 116 (Leases) impact:
Before: Operating leases = Rent expense only After:
- Asset ↑ (Right-of-Use)
- Liability ↑ (Lease obligation)
- D/E ratio worsens
- EBITDA improves
Same lease. Different numbers.
Always check if company recently adopted Ind AS before comparing metrics year-on-year.
#IndAS #AccountingStandards”
Instagram: “Why do company numbers suddenly change? 📊
It’s called Ind AS transition!
BEFORE (Old IGAAP): 🏠 Rented office = Just rent expense 📊 Debt on balance sheet = Only loans
AFTER (Ind AS): 🏠 Rented office = Asset + Liability on books 📊 Debt = Loans + Lease obligations
RESULT: • Assets increase ↑ • Liabilities increase ↑ • D/E ratio worsens • EBITDA improves (no rent!) • Net profit changes
Same business. Different rules. Different picture.
Always compare apples to apples! 🍎
#IndAS #AccountingChanges”