Basel Norms in India: Complete Guide to Basel I, II, III & Beyond
Comprehensive guide to Basel norms in India. Learn about Basel I, II, III, capital adequacy, risk management, liquidity ratios, and RBI's implementation.
Introduction: Why Do Banks Need Capital Rules?
In 2008, when Lehman Brothers collapsed, it sent shockwaves globally. Banks that seemed “too big to fail” were suddenly failing. Why? They had taken excessive risks with minimal capital buffers. The losses wiped out their equity, and taxpayers had to bail them out.
Basel norms are global banking regulations designed to prevent such crises. They ensure banks maintain enough capital to absorb losses, manage risks, and continue operating during economic shocks. Here’s how these complex rules work and apply in India.
What are Basel Norms?
Definition
Basel norms are international banking regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), housed at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland.
Purpose
- Ensure banks have enough capital
- Manage various risks effectively
- Maintain financial system stability
- Create level playing field globally
Evolution
| Accord | Year | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Basel I | 1988 | Credit risk, minimum capital |
| Basel II | 2004 | Risk management, supervision |
| Basel III | 2010 | Capital quality, liquidity |
| Basel IV (finalization) | 2023+ | Further refinements |
Basel I: The Foundation
Background
After several bank failures in the 1970s-80s, G10 countries created uniform standards.
Key Elements
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR):
$$CAR = \frac{Capital}{Risk\ Weighted\ Assets} \times 100$$
Minimum Requirement: 8%
Capital Components
| Tier | Components |
|---|---|
| Tier 1 (Core) | Equity capital, disclosed reserves |
| Tier 2 (Supplementary) | Undisclosed reserves, revaluation reserves, subordinated debt |
Risk Weights (Simple)
| Asset Type | Risk Weight |
|---|---|
| Cash, Government Securities | 0% |
| Banks | 20% |
| Residential Mortgages | 50% |
| Corporate Loans | 100% |
Limitations of Basel I
❌ Only credit risk considered ❌ Same weight for all corporates (AAA or junk) ❌ Operational risk ignored ❌ Market risk ignored ❌ Regulatory arbitrage possible
Basel II: Risk-Based Framework
Introduction
Released in 2004, addressed Basel I shortcomings through three pillars.
Three Pillar Structure
Basel II Framework
│
├── Pillar 1: Minimum Capital Requirements
│
├── Pillar 2: Supervisory Review
│
└── Pillar 3: Market Discipline
Pillar 1: Minimum Capital Requirements
Risks Covered:
- Credit Risk – Borrower default
- Market Risk – Trading book losses
- Operational Risk – Fraud, system failures
CAR Formula (Extended):
$$CAR = \frac{Capital}{Credit\ Risk\ RWA + Market\ Risk\ RWA + Operational\ Risk\ RWA}$$
Minimum: 8%
Credit Risk Approaches
| Approach | Description | Sophistication |
|---|---|---|
| Standardized | Regulator-prescribed risk weights | Basic |
| Foundation IRB | Bank estimates PD, regulator provides LGD | Intermediate |
| Advanced IRB | Bank estimates all risk parameters | Advanced |
IRB = Internal Ratings Based PD = Probability of Default LGD = Loss Given Default
Operational Risk Approaches
| Approach | Calculation |
|---|---|
| Basic Indicator | 15% of gross income |
| Standardized | Business line specific percentages |
| Advanced (AMA) | Bank’s internal models |
Pillar 2: Supervisory Review
Regulators (RBI in India) review:
- Bank’s internal risk assessment
- Capital planning
- Stress testing
- Governance quality
ICAAP: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process
Pillar 3: Market Discipline
Banks must disclose:
- Risk exposures
- Risk management practices
- Capital adequacy details
- Help investors make informed decisions
Basel III: Post-Crisis Reforms
Background
2008 financial crisis exposed Basel II weaknesses:
- Not enough high-quality capital
- Insufficient liquidity buffers
- Procyclical effects
- Systemic risk not addressed
Key Reforms
1. Higher Quality Capital
| Capital Type | Description |
|---|---|
| CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1) | Highest quality – equity, retained earnings |
| AT1 (Additional Tier 1) | Perpetual bonds, can absorb losses |
| Tier 2 | Subordinated debt with conditions |
2. Higher Capital Requirements
| Requirement | Basel II | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Total CAR | 8% | 8% (unchanged) |
| CET1 | Not specified | 4.5% |
| Tier 1 | 4% | 6% |
3. Capital Buffers (Additional)
| Buffer | Requirement | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Conservation Buffer (CCB) | 2.5% | Absorb losses in stress |
| Countercyclical Buffer (CCyB) | 0-2.5% | Build capital in good times |
| D-SIB Buffer | Variable | For systemically important banks |
Leverage Ratio
$$Leverage\ Ratio = \frac{Tier\ 1\ Capital}{Total\ Exposure} \times 100$$
Minimum: 3% (India: 4% for D-SIBs)
Purpose: Catch risks that RWA might miss.
Liquidity Ratios
1. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
$$LCR = \frac{High\ Quality\ Liquid\ Assets\ (HQLA)}{Net\ Cash\ Outflows\ (30\ days)} \times 100$$
Minimum: 100% Purpose: Survive 30-day stress scenario.
2. Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)
$$NSFR = \frac{Available\ Stable\ Funding}{Required\ Stable\ Funding} \times 100$$
Minimum: 100% Purpose: Long-term (1 year) funding stability.
Basel Implementation in India
RBI’s Approach
RBI has implemented Basel norms with India-specific adaptations.
Current Requirements (Basel III)
| Requirement | Domestic Banks | Foreign Banks |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Tier 1 | 7% | 7% |
| Total CAR | 9% (vs 8% global) | 9% |
| Capital Conservation Buffer | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Total (including CCB) | 11.5% | 11.5% |
D-SIB Requirements
Domestic Systemically Important Banks (D-SIBs) require additional buffer.
D-SIB List (India):
| Bucket | Banks | Additional CET1 |
|---|---|---|
| Bucket 4 | SBI | 0.80% |
| Bucket 3 | HDFC Bank | 0.60% |
| Bucket 2 | ICICI Bank | 0.40% |
| Bucket 1 | Axis Bank, Kotak | 0.20% |
Timeline of Implementation
| Year | Development |
|---|---|
| 1992 | Basel I adopted |
| 2007 | Basel II implementation began |
| 2013 | Basel III implementation started |
| 2019 | Full Basel III (capital) implementation |
| 2021 | NSFR implemented |
| Ongoing | Basel III.1 (Final Basel) implementation |
Capital Adequacy in Practice
Sample Calculation
Hypothetical Bank Data:
- CET1 Capital: ₹50,000 crore
- AT1 Capital: ₹5,000 crore
- Tier 2 Capital: ₹10,000 crore
- Risk Weighted Assets: ₹5,00,000 crore
Calculations:
$$CET1\ Ratio = \frac{50,000}{5,00,000} \times 100 = 10%$$
$$Tier\ 1\ Ratio = \frac{50,000 + 5,000}{5,00,000} \times 100 = 11%$$
$$Total\ CAR = \frac{50,000 + 5,000 + 10,000}{5,00,000} \times 100 = 13%$$
Assessment:
- CET1: 10% > 5.5% requirement ✅
- Tier 1: 11% > 7% requirement ✅
- Total: 13% > 11.5% (including buffers) ✅
What If Bank Falls Short?
Consequences:
- Cannot pay dividends
- Cannot give bonuses
- Restrictions on lending growth
- Must raise capital
- RBI may impose restrictions
Capital Raising Options:
- Issue equity shares
- Issue AT1 bonds
- Reduce risk-weighted assets
- Improve profitability
Risk Weighted Assets (RWA)
Concept
Not all assets carry equal risk. RWA adjusts for this.
Formula:
$$RWA = Asset\ Value \times Risk\ Weight$$
Risk Weights (India - Standardized)
| Asset Category | Risk Weight |
|---|---|
| Cash | 0% |
| Government Securities | 0% |
| AAA rated corporates | 20% |
| A rated corporates | 50% |
| BB- to B- rated | 100% |
| Below B- | 150% |
| Unrated | 100% |
| Residential mortgages | 35-75% |
| Commercial real estate | 100% |
| Retail loans | 75% |
Impact on Lending
Banks consider RWA when lending:
- Lower risk weight = More profitable
- Higher risk weight = Capital expensive
- Influences credit decisions
Liquidity Standards Deep Dive
LCR Components
High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA):
| Level | Assets | Haircut |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Cash, RBI deposits, Government securities | 0% |
| Level 2A | High-rated PSU/corporate bonds | 15% |
| Level 2B | Certain equities, lower-rated bonds | 25-50% |
Level 2 assets capped at 40% of HQLA
Cash Outflows Include:
- Retail deposit runoff
- Wholesale funding runoff
- Committed credit facilities
Indian Banks’ LCR Position
Most large Indian banks maintain LCR well above 100%:
- SBI: ~130%+
- HDFC Bank: ~120%+
- ICICI Bank: ~125%+
Why Higher? Conservative approach, abundant government securities holdings.
NSFR Explained
Available Stable Funding (ASF):
- Equity capital
- Long-term deposits
- Medium-term wholesale funding
Required Stable Funding (RSF):
- For assets like loans, investments
- Higher for illiquid assets
Stress Testing
What is Stress Testing?
Banks simulate adverse scenarios to assess capital/liquidity impact.
Types of Stress Tests
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Sensitivity Analysis | One factor change (e.g., 10% NPA increase) |
| Scenario Analysis | Multiple factors (recession scenario) |
| Reverse Stress Test | What breaks the bank? |
RBI Stress Tests
RBI conducts:
- Macro stress tests annually
- Publication in Financial Stability Report
- Assesses systemic risks
Common Stress Scenarios
- Interest rate shocks (±200 bps)
- GDP decline scenarios
- Large NPA increases
- Liquidity crisis
- Forex volatility
Global vs Indian Context
Key Differences
| Aspect | Global Basel | India |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum CAR | 8% | 9% |
| CET1 | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Implementation | Country discretion | RBI mandated |
| Risk weights | Country specific | India-specific |
| SLR | Not applicable | 18% (additional liquidity) |
India’s Conservative Approach
Advantages:
- Banks more resilient
- Limited impact of global crises
- Lower systemic risk
Challenges:
- Higher cost of capital
- May limit credit growth
- Competitive disadvantage internationally
Recent and Future Developments
Basel III.1 (Final Basel III)
Reforms to be implemented:
- Revised standardized approaches
- Output floor (72.5% of standardized)
- Constraints on internal models
- Implementation: 2028 onwards globally
Climate Risk Integration
Emerging focus:
- Climate-related financial risks
- Stress testing for climate
- ESG considerations
Operational Resilience
- Cyber risk management
- Business continuity planning
- Third-party risk
Impact on You
As a Customer
- Safer banks: Better capitalized, more resilient
- Credit access: May affect loan availability/pricing
- Deposits: More protected from bank failures
As an Investor
- Bank stocks: Capital ratios matter
- AT1 bonds: Higher risk, higher return
- Dividend policies: Constrained by capital rules
As an Employee
- Risk management careers: Growing demand
- Compliance roles: Basel expertise valued
- Technology: RegTech for Basel compliance
Key Takeaways
- Basel norms ensure bank safety – Capital buffers against losses
- Three pillars (Basel II) – Capital, supervision, disclosure
- Basel III added quality – CET1, buffers, liquidity ratios
- India is conservative – 11.5% CAR vs 10.5% globally
- LCR and NSFR ensure liquidity – Survive stress scenarios
- D-SIBs have extra requirements – Too big to fail = more capital
- Risk weights drive lending – Lower weight = cheaper capital
Disclaimer
This article is for educational purposes only. Basel norms and RBI guidelines are complex and change periodically. Verify current requirements from official RBI circulars. This is not financial advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is CAR? A: Capital Adequacy Ratio – capital as percentage of risk-weighted assets. Measures bank’s ability to absorb losses.
Q: Why is India’s requirement higher than global Basel? A: Conservative approach by RBI for financial stability. 9% vs 8% minimum, plus buffers.
Q: What happens if a bank’s CAR falls below requirement? A: Restrictions on dividends, bonuses; must raise capital; can face regulatory action.
Q: What are AT1 bonds? A: Additional Tier 1 bonds – perpetual, can be written off or converted to equity if bank’s capital falls below trigger.
Q: How do Basel norms affect loans? A: Higher risk-weight loans consume more capital, so banks may charge higher interest or limit exposure.
Q: What is LCR? A: Liquidity Coverage Ratio – ensures bank can survive 30-day liquidity stress. Must be 100%+.
Basel norms might seem like arcane regulatory requirements, but they’re the guardrails that keep your money safe. Every time you deposit money in a bank, Basel ensures that bank can withstand shocks and return your money. Strong capital and liquidity = stable banking system = protected depositors.